Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Mixed up figures in "Divergence of TFBS across related yeast species"

I am a PhD student at CS Dept, Univ of Washington, Seattle. From your Science paper "Divergence of TFBS across related yeast species" I have some questions.
  • Should Fig 2C be current Fig 2E?
  • Should Fig 2D_1 be current Fig 2C?
  • Should Fig 2E be current Fig 2D_1?
Looks like the Figure legend was mixed up. The text in the paper matches
up with the Figure, but in the legend parts C-E are mixed up. It should
read:

Comparison of binding by Ste12 and Tec1 across S. cerevisiae (red), S.
mikatae (blue), and S. bayanus (green). (A) Conserved binding. (B)
Conserved binding with quantitative signal differences. (C) Species-specific
binding despite conserved consensus sequences. (D) Binding only in S.
mikatae and S. bayanus. (E) Conserved binding with loss of consensus
sequences in one species. ChIp-chip enrichment signals are shown (log 2
ratios). Circles and squares represent matches to Tec1 PWM and Ste12
PWM, respectively. Triangles, nonconserved peaks; **, >2-fold difference
in peak signal intensity; *, >1.5-fold difference in peak signal
intensity.

No comments: